I wrote the content on this blog with sincere and holy intentions with the knowledge that I had at the time... We live, learn and errors are exposed and more truths are revealed...

Only GOD is perfect. It's vital that you seek the Lord to expose any errors that you've embraced. Please ask Him to expose any areas of darkness to you and for what is necessary to do to dispossess what's NOT of truth.



Flames of fire dance joyfully as dreams of fervor conjure up images of red hot passion for the gusto of life.

Sizzle, spark, explode -

Fireballs light up the sky. Wow! a thunder flash with a clap -

The flames are vivid with the awesome glow of orange colors blended with yellow highlights that accent the blaze.

This display is the bomb torched with a rocket plan. Such rapture has lit our fire. We are dynamite on this journey.

Come on fire, fall on us. Pour your liquid potency. Ignite our souls that we may be engulfed with magnified intensity.

Blow up our hearts. Dance with us....


Copyright 2010


Copyright 2014 - Content on this blog, except content from the King James Holy Bible, which is in the public domain.

Also, excerpts from the works of other authors here is in compliance with section 107 - Fair Use - of the U.S. Copyright law - and/or by permission of the authors.

Note: You can certainly share content from this blog. At the end of each post, share options -- e-mail, Facebook, Twitter, etc. are listed. Each share option contains a link to this blog. Using the share options shown below each post does NOT violate copyright law - since links to this blog are included in the subject share options.

Additional note: Copyright law does allow others to use, without prior permission from original authors, brief excerpts from the work of original authors. Brief excerpts from this blog may be copied and pasted elsewhere, provided the name of the original authors be included in locations where you choose to post. Copying and pasting elsewhere - ENTIRE posts without the permission of original authors ISN'T in compliance with U.S. Copyright law.

If you elect to go beyond brief excerpts from this blog, please use the share options shown after each post. All of those options include links to this blog.

Thank you.

Thursday, December 16, 2010


Greetings -

Here are instances where Jesus, God and the Spirit have been removed:

Matthew 25:13 - KJV
Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh.

Matthew 25:13 - NIV
Therefore keep watch, because you do not know the day or the hour.
(Note: They removed "Son of man" which equals - they removed Christ.)

Luke 4:4 - KJV
...That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.

Luke 4:4 - NIV
...Man does not live on bread alone.
(Note: They removed "God.")

John 6:47 - KJV
...He that believeth on me hath everlasting life.

John 6:47 - NIV
I tell you the truth, he who believes has everlasting life.
(Note: There is no mention of "on me."  How is that telling us the truth if they leave out "on me?"  To remove "on me" is to remove  Christ.)

The Acts 2:30 - KJV
...according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne;

The Acts 2:30 - NIV
But he was a prophet and knew that God had promised him on oath that he would place one of his descendants on his throne.
(Note: They removed "Christ.")

The Acts 8:37 - KJV
...I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.

The Acts 8:37 - NIV
(Note: They removed Christ - and the entire verse.  The NIV does  not have verse 37 - at all.) 

The Acts 23:9 - KJV
...let us not fight against God.

The Acts 23:9 - NIV
(Note: They removed "God."  That statement "let us not fight against God" has been removed.)

1 Peter 1:22 - KJV
...through the Spirit..

1 Peter 1:22 - NIV
(Note: They removed "the Spirit.")

Revelation 20:9 - KJV came down from God...

Revelation 20:9 - NIV
fire came down from heaven...
(Note: They removed "God.")

Revelation 5:14 - KJV
... and worshipped him that liveth for ever and ever.

Revelation 5:14 - NIV
...and the elders fell down and worshipped.
(Note: They removed "him..." - which equals - they removed Christ.)

1 John 4:3 - KJV
And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God:

1 John 4:3 - NIV
but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God.
(Note: They removed "that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not "of" God. - The KJV says that EVERY spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God."  The NIV removed "is come in the flesh" - does that mean that they are one of the EVERY spirit?) Also in that scripture, the NIV mentions "Jesus" but removed "Christ."  It says, " but every spirit that does not acknowlege Jesus is not from God."  The KJV says "Jesus Christ."

It deeply disturbs me that in the above cited instances, "God, Jesus, and the Spirit" were removed. 

Here are a couple of other instances of NIV "changes":

Romans 13:9 - KJV
...Thou shalt not bear false witness,...

Romans 13:9 - NIV
(Note: That statement "Thou shalt not bear false witness" has been removed. - Does that mean that the NIV does bear false witness?)

Revelation 21:24 - KJV
And the nations of them which are saved shall walk in the light:

Revelation 21:24 - NIV
The nations will walk by its light,...
(Note: They removed "which are saved.")

Notes from former NIV readers (first mentioned here under the topic, "MY EXPERIENCES WITH THE ORIGINAL KING JAMES BIBLE, DATED SUNDAY DECEMBER 12, 2010.)

- NIV perverts even the tone of the word of GOD (e-mail from a former NIV reader)

- Former NIV reader says NIV alienates the Father and the Son
(The former NIV reader stated, "Sure, I got saved by the NIV, but it made Jesus a little bit distant from the Father.")

Sandra's comments:  For new converts to Christ, I have often been informed that the Gospel of John is a good book to begin in the original KJV.  There have been vigorous discussions that the NIV and other versions are easier to understand.  For hundreds of years before the other versions became available, scores of people got saved with usage of the original KJV version.  Many strong, potent, powerful Christians were/are the result.  Of course, sincere prayer is vital for understanding God's word, and of utmost importance is to love the Lord our God with all of our hearts, souls, and minds, and to love others, according to God's commands.

Also, as the former NIV reader stated above, "Sure, I got saved by the NIV, but it made Jesus a little bit distant from the Father," 

Further, relative to the NIV being easier to understand:

All of those removals of "God, and Jesus" that I mentioned in scripture citations above, makes me even more disinclined to support the NIV.  If I were a new convert, I believe that I'd be inclined to read the Bible that included God, and Jesus, such as is shown in the original KJV.

In addition, I read that one Christian stated that it is possible to get saved using the NIV, but that it does not promote spiritual growth. 

Some may believe that those removals of God, and Jesus from the NIV are not of major importance. I lovingly disagree. Also, I wonder what else has been removed from the NIV. In addition, the website mentions omissions and distortions relative to the NAS and the NKJV. I have read some of that, as well.

Relative to the foreign languge translation matters:

I confess ignorance about said issue but sincerely state that I am deeply grateful for those that our Lord has led in those realms.

Certainly we need saints who are knowledgable to go forth into all the world to teach and to preach the gospel of the kingdom of God, according to what the word of our Lord commands. Indeed there are people of excellence who our Lord has appointed to minister relative to foreign languages and cultures.  Their valuable endeavors are much appreciated. 

My original post on this topic received numerous lengthy comments that varied in tone.  I deeply appreciate all of those comments because truly we do learn from one another.  My firm belief is that we are all students and teachers in the body of our Lord.  Praise His awesome all-knowing name.  

I was ready to move on from the topic but continued to get comments about it.  The most recent comment was one that I read this a.m. (Thursday December 16, 2010) that was sent to me, via e-mail, by a fellow Christian who stated that she was referred here to LIONS SHARE MAJESTY relative to the said topic.  I posted her comments on this blog this a.m. under the post topic, "MY EXPERIENCES WITH THE ORIGINAL KING JAMES BIBLE" dated Sunday December 12, 2010.

Also, I have moved here the comments below relative to my "TAG ON" about the KJV posting.

Comments from "TAG ON" post dated Sunday December 12, 2010:

Frank King said...

Interesting observations. It's amazing what you find in the Bible when you become a student of the Word of God. As for me, my favorite version of the Bible is the King James Version. This is mostly because it is a more strict word for word translation from the Hebrew and Greek manuscripts, and also the King James Version shows in italics any words the translators inserted into the passage. This makes it easy for me when I want to translate from the Hebrew and Greek manuscripts to see how they arrived at the English wording that they did. Again, this is just my personal preference. I do use the NIV at times when I want to quote verse, and the NIV is clearer for quoting.

December 13, 2010 10:33 PM

lioneagle said...

Hi Pastor Frank -

Thank you for weighing in on this. Your viewpoints are valued indeed.

Interesting that you mentioned the part about the italics in the KJV. Yes...indeed.

My experience is that the original KJV is easier to memorize and quote. When I started mostly using the KJV, that progressed to where I can quote it from memory for about a half hour without repeating a citation. Sometimes I quote it out loud without pausing - for more than 30 minutes. Some years ago, I found myself in a disturbing circumstance and I didn't have my Bible with me. I was able to quote out loud extensively from the KJV and that was a major help in that mini-crisis. Now I take my Bible everywhere. Some months ago, I was with some people and we were getting out of the car to go to the grocery store. I got my Bible. One of my companions told me that I could leave my Bible in the car. My response was that I take my Bible everywhere - and I added there could be someone in the grocery store who needs something from the Bible. They agreed...though I don't believe that it was heartily. No Bible goes with me everywhere, and I pray regularly to our Lord that I will steadfastly live what is in its pages!

May our Lord help us all. 

Back to the present  today, Thursday December 16, 2010:

From Sandra:

Thank you to all who have commented. I sincerely appreciate your viewpoints and believe that there has been teaching and learning in the process.

Love to you all, Sandra


Righteous Father God, only You know it all.  I have written here as Your messenger with the awareness that I am finite, and that You are infinite.  We are commanded to love You, to obey You, and to trust You - above all else. 

Please move upon hearts to seek You in earnest in regard to this Bible version matter.  I know what You have instructed me and that is to mostly use the original King James version - with rare exceptions.  I am also certain that You instructed me to post these comments.  What I don't know is what You purpose to do in the hearts of others.  That role, Lord, is Yours alone.  You assigned me this duty to post the words.  My prayer is that You are sought for clarity and direction on the matter.  Some of my fellow
body-of-Christ members already have the necessary clarity from You while others do not.  May only Your will be obeyed by us all.

Thank you, Lord - Amen.  

To close, below are words from our Lord:  

This a.m. the Lord gave me these scriptures:

Galatians 1:7 - KJV
...and would pervert the gospel of Christ.

Jeremiah 23:36 - KJV
...for ye have perverted the words of the living God, of the Lord of hosts our God.

And Hosea 4:6 - KJV
My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge:...

Note: This topic is available for copying/printing/distribution.  It is re-posted on blog, "FREELY RECEIVED FREELY GIVEN" at  Specifically, it is located under the separate TAB titled, "BIBLE INFORMATION."  Also, on that blog, in the MAIN section, at the top of the HOME page, are listed "Conditions" for such usage.



  2. I have an NIV, but have never cared much for it even without the above comparisons. All I can honestly say is that it didn't sound right so I shelved it. I think I would almost use the New World Translation (JW's) before I would use the NIV. They disavow Jesus as God Incarnate, but you know where they are coming from. One expects differences and/or errors. One would automatically assume that the NIV would be closer to the Truth. Thank you for your research. I will compare those same scriptures. We would all do well to do comparative study and not take things on face value.

    Thank you.

  3. Sandra - As in all things, I heartily seek God's leading. You have given much food for thought here. I don't think I have a definitive answer. But I absolutely appreciate the research you've done, and your dedication to protecting the Word of God. I will end with this thought, as you so eloquently put it:

    "May only Your will be obeyed by us all." Yes, Lord, yes.


  4. Greetings -

    Thank you for visiting for the first time. You are certainly welcome here. I agree with you, "We would all do well to do comparative study and not take things on face value." Yes, Amen

    @ Sharon
    I'm glad that you appreciate the research...
    Yes, the end thought is indeed truth.

    Sidebar: I appreciate your suggestion about the post that I placed today. Thank you much, Sharon...

  5. Sandra,

    Thanks for your keen observations. You have highlighted a very significant consideration when deciding one version of the Bible versus another. As I said in response to your previous post on this subject, my Bible of choice is the KJV.

  6. The NIV has not been mistranlated when it comes to these specific words. They are correct to omit these things. However, it is also a correct translation to leave them in. What's going on is this. There's more than one Greek version that's being translated. The NIV appears to be translating from the Wescott-Hort Greek version which does not include these specific words. Most of the other Engilsh versions appear to be tranlating from either the Textus Receptus or the Robinson/Pierpont Byzantine Greek versions which both include all these words that the other Greek version does not have. This means that the issue with these terms being omitted is not with the NIV translation itself, but instead the issue is with the Greek version that the translators chose to translate from. This is reason for the differences.

  7. Greetings Rivkah -

    Very interesting. Thank you for that helpful information.

    Whatever the reasons for the removal of "GOD, JESUS, and the Spirit" from the NIV... - in the subject passages in the King James Bible, "GOD, JESUS, and the Spirit" are shown there. My firm choice is to read the King James Bible where ALL of the above appear - in English print in those subject passages...

    My experience is that the King James Bible has more power, potency, and rhythm. Also, it is easiest to memorize - others agree with me about what I have expressed about the King James Bible - while others disagree. Such is life. I love people, regardless of what Bible version choices are made - for without love - we are nothing.

    If you are so inclined, under my separate TAB on the Home page here, "SPIRITUAL WARFARE," - at the bottom of that page, there are links that lead to online information relative to doubts about the NKJV and the NAS...

    May we all strive to obey GOD - in all... - for only He knows what is best for us - individually, as well as collectively. We are finite. GOD is infinite. HE is the SOURCE - all else is resource.

    Again, Rivkah, thank you. I appreciate your comments which are indeed helpful.

    Love in His service,

  8. Sandra, I did read this post. I read it first which took me back to see the beginning of it all :)this was opened my eyes the most - had no idea that these were omitted in the NIV. As to why, It is what it is - but I'm with you. I see no reason to accept the fact that they be omitted - regardless of the reason. It just changes it - in fact, it changes it a lot! Reminds me of the complacency of Today's Christians. The watered down word to make it more acceptable to everyone. I won't debate it - it is what it is - but I will remember what I have learned here today in my studies. Thank you.

    Patrina <")>><


Greetings -

Thank you for visiting and commenting. It is my pleasure to read from your heart places. We are all students and teachers and I so enjoy, precious people, the beneficial engagements with you.